![]() Well, actually PowerPC is one of the newest arch's around, created initially in the 90's, and its a open arch, even NXP gave permission to fully open documentation to the project It is part of the Open Power Community. PowerPC ( PPC64?) is old and slow and doesn't really compare with the current 7nm x86_64 AMD processors. Until someone else develops something more secure. actually arm is more now related, but Risc-V is the future period. Servers it might be good for, but all else. If I cannot use it on a laptop, and if its that heavy, no use for me. You see, before you why I do not trust openpower for the foreseeable future. POWER9 ( pp64el) and perhaps POWER10 both compete on performance, if not price, and Raptor offer fully free (as in speech) desktops: īut with a TDP in excess of 90W (!) I don't think we'll see any laptops based on that ISA. The RISC-V laptop from Balthazar looks interesting but all RISC-V implementations are focused on power efficiency rather than performance so the same would apply to those. This suggests the Rockchip RK3399 is more capable for both CPU-dependent tasks and gaming, though this is obviously impacted by the quality of the device’s firmware as poor firmware can cripple otherwise solid hardware.Other project, that is not ARM based, but Instead PowerPC based is the PowerPC ( PPC64?) is old and slow and doesn't really compare with the current 7nm x86_64 AMD processors. In terms of GPU performance, the Rockchip RK3399 offers about 50% more performance than the S912 across 3DMark’s various benchmarks. ![]() However, the gap decreases significantly for multi-core benchmarks. The RK3399’s single core performance destroys the Amlogic S912. GeekBench 4.0, 3DMark and Antutu 6.0 were all used to measure RK3399 vs S912 performance.Īs you can see in the benchmark gallery below, the Rockchip RK3399 bests the S912 across the board, showing significant leads in both CPU and GPU benchmarks. I’ve run a number of popular benchmarks on both my K99 RK3399 Android TV box as well as a number of other Amlogic S912 devices I’ve tested. Nothing highlights the performance differences more than synthetic benchmarks. ![]() However, as the Rockchip RK3399 isn’t technically a TV box SoC, it lacks support for features such as HDR which will be an issue for users with the latest 4K TV sets. This is similar to the Amlogic S912, though Amlogic’s processor only handles 8-bit H.264 at excluding the 10-bit H.264 codec favored by Anime fans and 4K 60fps H.264 videos. It can play modern codecs like 10-bit H.264 at and 10-bit H.265 at (2160p is typically called 4K for the consumer market). In terms of video playback, the Rockchip RK3399 is positioned as a powerful chip for media playback. This compares favorably against the Amlogic S912’s octacore ARM Cortex-A53 CPU and ARM Mali-T820MP3 GPU. ![]() It also features a ARM Mali-T860MP4 GPU that supports OpenGL ES1.1/2.0/3.0, OpenCL1.2, DirectX11.1 and more. As mentioned before, the Rockchip RK3399 features ARM’s big.LITTLEdesign, combining two Cortex-A17 cores for high performance computing and four Cortex-A53 cores optimized for low power consumption. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |